Details

    • Type: New Feature
    • Status: Resolved (View Workflow)
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Done
    • Component/s: ldap-plugin
    • Labels:
      None
    • Similar Issues:

      Description

      It would be a nice feature to support multiple OU.
      And this feature may help performance because Jenkins doesn't need to search entire LDAP tree. (I think people who use Jenkins should be a small group in most organizations except software company.)

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            Hide
            recampbell Ryan Campbell added a comment -

            Brad Macpherson, Sean Robinson, Simona Avornicesei,Greg Staniak, Can you please give this beta a spin? It's available in the experimental update center.

            Show
            recampbell Ryan Campbell added a comment - Brad Macpherson , Sean Robinson , Simona Avornicesei , Greg Staniak , Can you please give this beta a spin? It's available in the experimental update center.
            Hide
            rsandell rsandell added a comment -

            Released in 1.16

            Show
            rsandell rsandell added a comment - Released in 1.16
            Hide
            ripclawffb Asif Shaikh added a comment -

            I see that you've added multiple server support, but would it be possible to add multiple OU support within the same server configuration? We have multiple root OUs that we need to query. However, when I don't provide a search DN, I get timeouts due to LDAP referrals. Our firewall rule allows access to only a single LDAPS vip. We can't use referrals.

            Show
            ripclawffb Asif Shaikh added a comment - I see that you've added multiple server support, but would it be possible to add multiple OU support within the same server configuration? We have multiple root OUs that we need to query. However, when I don't provide a search DN, I get timeouts due to LDAP referrals. Our firewall rule allows access to only a single LDAPS vip. We can't use referrals.
            Hide
            markdemich Mark DeMichele added a comment -

            Asif Shaikh, we're running into a similar issue.  Did you ever find a workaround?

            Show
            markdemich Mark DeMichele added a comment - Asif Shaikh , we're running into a similar issue.  Did you ever find a workaround?
            Hide
            ripclawffb Asif Shaikh added a comment -

            Yes. We ended up pointing to a global catalog server. So instead of using port 636, we used 3269 and it resolved the issue.

            Show
            ripclawffb Asif Shaikh added a comment - Yes. We ended up pointing to a global catalog server. So instead of using port 636, we used 3269 and it resolved the issue.

              People

              • Assignee:
                rsandell rsandell
                Reporter:
                dennys Dennys Hsieh
              • Votes:
                9 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                16 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                • Created:
                  Updated:
                  Resolved: