Uploaded image for project: 'Jenkins'
  1. Jenkins
  2. JENKINS-45287

Debian packaging should not be satisfied by Java 9

    Details

    • Similar Issues:

      Description

      The Debian package is the only one that still declares a Java dependency (https://github.com/jenkinsci/packaging/commit/188ffd36c2abd83ca9e572b6b1fb6d2f423685bc) but it declares ≥8.

      This can in some cases result in Java 9 installations when those appear to not work with Jenkins.

      If possible the dependency should be limited to exactly Java 8, or dropped altogether with corresponding explanation on the package listing page.

      Similarly, Java dependency documentation for Opensuse/Redhat should be reviewed to ensure we don't claim Java 9 compatibility.

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            Hide
            scm_issue_link SCM/JIRA link daemon added a comment -

            Code changed in jenkins
            User: Raul Arabaolaza
            Path:
            deb/publish/gen.rb
            http://jenkins-ci.org/commit/packaging/7a95e407ff58e9133fe80c3441d48bd988990df6
            Log:
            JENKINS-45287 Fix misleading documentation

            Show
            scm_issue_link SCM/JIRA link daemon added a comment - Code changed in jenkins User: Raul Arabaolaza Path: deb/publish/gen.rb http://jenkins-ci.org/commit/packaging/7a95e407ff58e9133fe80c3441d48bd988990df6 Log: JENKINS-45287 Fix misleading documentation
            Hide
            scm_issue_link SCM/JIRA link daemon added a comment -

            Code changed in jenkins
            User: Raul Arabaolaza
            Path:
            deb/publish/gen.rb
            http://jenkins-ci.org/commit/packaging/7d942177002e861ff22ec53df42a3dc2815d3f0c
            Log:
            JENKINS-45287 Make the java 9 issue bold in documentation

            Show
            scm_issue_link SCM/JIRA link daemon added a comment - Code changed in jenkins User: Raul Arabaolaza Path: deb/publish/gen.rb http://jenkins-ci.org/commit/packaging/7d942177002e861ff22ec53df42a3dc2815d3f0c Log: JENKINS-45287 Make the java 9 issue bold in documentation
            Hide
            scm_issue_link SCM/JIRA link daemon added a comment -

            Code changed in jenkins
            User: Raul Arabaolaza
            Path:
            deb/publish/gen.rb
            http://jenkins-ci.org/commit/packaging/d3f21f575eb0a9f3aa24fb31466f463dc28da5ce
            Log:
            JENKINS-45287 Add link to jenkins issue regarding Java 9 compatibility

            Show
            scm_issue_link SCM/JIRA link daemon added a comment - Code changed in jenkins User: Raul Arabaolaza Path: deb/publish/gen.rb http://jenkins-ci.org/commit/packaging/d3f21f575eb0a9f3aa24fb31466f463dc28da5ce Log: JENKINS-45287 Add link to jenkins issue regarding Java 9 compatibility
            Hide
            scm_issue_link SCM/JIRA link daemon added a comment -

            Code changed in jenkins
            User: Sam Van Oort
            Path:
            deb/build/debian/control
            deb/build/debian/jenkins.default
            deb/build/debian/jenkins.init
            deb/publish/gen.rb
            http://jenkins-ci.org/commit/packaging/e3ddccea97cac6649b8136e8bc574583f5df6fca
            Log:
            Merge pull request #101 from raul-arabaolaza/JENKINS-45287

            JENKINS-45287 Debian packaging should not be satisfied by Java 9

            Compare: https://github.com/jenkinsci/packaging/compare/3835c07d1a14...e3ddccea97ca

            Show
            scm_issue_link SCM/JIRA link daemon added a comment - Code changed in jenkins User: Sam Van Oort Path: deb/build/debian/control deb/build/debian/jenkins.default deb/build/debian/jenkins.init deb/publish/gen.rb http://jenkins-ci.org/commit/packaging/e3ddccea97cac6649b8136e8bc574583f5df6fca Log: Merge pull request #101 from raul-arabaolaza/ JENKINS-45287 JENKINS-45287 Debian packaging should not be satisfied by Java 9 Compare: https://github.com/jenkinsci/packaging/compare/3835c07d1a14...e3ddccea97ca
            Hide
            oleg_nenashev Oleg Nenashev added a comment -

            As we discussed in the PR, it should not be backported into 2.60.3

            Show
            oleg_nenashev Oleg Nenashev added a comment - As we discussed in the PR, it should not be backported into 2.60.3

              People

              • Assignee:
                rarabaolaza Raul Arabaolaza
                Reporter:
                danielbeck Daniel Beck
              • Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                4 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                • Created:
                  Updated:
                  Resolved: