Uploaded image for project: 'Jenkins'
  1. Jenkins
  2. JENKINS-55101

Create official Java 11 Docker Packaging for BlueOcean

    Details

    • Similar Issues:

      Description

      During the hackathon we have created https://github.com/jenkinsci/blueocean-plugin/blob/master/Dockerfile.jdk10 . Now it needs to be expanded to Java 11 and added to the common release flows

      Acceptance: 

      Approach 1:

      Approach 2:

      It needs agreement with the BlueOcean team.

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            Hide
            batmat Baptiste Mathus added a comment -

            As I've expressed elsewhere, I tend to think this image should be discontinued. I would say the experimental one is actually enough.

            IMO, it's really not great that we're providing many variants of Jenkins images. I think the Jenkins Project already has enough work with providing quality-guaranteed and maintaining the jenkins/jenkins different tags/variants, to also have "plugins" specific images like jenkins/blueocean.

            So, as such, my recommendation would be to close this as WONTFIX.

            Show
            batmat Baptiste Mathus added a comment - As I've expressed elsewhere, I tend to think this image should be discontinued. I would say the experimental one is actually enough. IMO, it's really not great that we're providing many variants of Jenkins images. I think the Jenkins Project already has enough work with providing quality-guaranteed and maintaining the jenkins/jenkins different tags/variants, to also have "plugins" specific images like jenkins/blueocean . So, as such, my recommendation would be to close this as WONTFIX.
            Hide
            jglick Jesse Glick added a comment -

            Agreed. We should not have separate official images which merely preinstall some arbitrary plugin selection.

            (A number of plugins build demo images showing the plugin being used in context on a sample project, which can be quite useful. Historically these have been uploaded to DockerHub, though I tend to regret this—in many cases you need special instructions to run the demo anyway, so it would be better to have people check out sources and make -C demo run.)

            Show
            jglick Jesse Glick added a comment - Agreed. We should not have separate official images which merely preinstall some arbitrary plugin selection. (A number of plugins build demo images showing the plugin being used in context on a sample project, which can be quite useful. Historically these have been uploaded to DockerHub, though I tend to regret this—in many cases you need special instructions to run the demo anyway, so it would be better to have people check out sources and make -C demo run .)
            Hide
            batmat Baptiste Mathus added a comment -

            I think actually in the future, we can keep using Docker Hub, but on the new experimental Jenkins org there, cf. JEP-217 by Oleg. Because on this new home, people know already by design of the naming that things can be changed, breaking, etc. per its very experimental nature.

            Show
            batmat Baptiste Mathus added a comment - I think actually in the future, we can keep using Docker Hub, but on the new experimental Jenkins org there, cf. JEP-217 by Oleg. Because on this new home, people know already by design of the naming that things can be changed, breaking, etc. per its very experimental nature.
            Hide
            oleg_nenashev Oleg Nenashev added a comment -

            As commented in WEBSITE-474, I agree with deprecating the image. JENKINS-52069 is also a good justification for not advertising it

            Show
            oleg_nenashev Oleg Nenashev added a comment - As commented in WEBSITE-474 , I agree with deprecating the image.  JENKINS-52069  is also a good justification for not advertising it
            Hide
            halkeye Gavin Mogan added a comment -

            I also like the idea of retiring the image. We have a lot of people show up in gitter blueocean channel asking about general pipeline issues.

            I think the docker image was great before blueocean made it cleanly into the update store, but its pretty stable these days, and can easily just get installed.

            Show
            halkeye Gavin Mogan added a comment - I also like the idea of retiring the image. We have a lot of people show up in gitter blueocean channel asking about general pipeline issues. I think the docker image was great before blueocean made it cleanly into the update store, but its pretty stable these days, and can easily just get installed.
            Hide
            batmat Baptiste Mathus added a comment -

            Not marking yet as WONTFIX, but I think this is where we are leaning towards.

            Show
            batmat Baptiste Mathus added a comment - Not marking yet as WONTFIX, but I think this is where we are leaning towards.

              People

              • Assignee:
                Unassigned
                Reporter:
                oleg_nenashev Oleg Nenashev
              • Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                4 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                • Created:
                  Updated: