Uploaded image for project: 'Jenkins'
  1. Jenkins
  2. JENKINS-8783

Renamin promotion process doesn't remove the original promotion process

    Details

    • Similar Issues:

      Description

      Create a promotion process that is dependent on a downstream build and save
      Rename that promotion process and save again
      Kick off downstream build and 2 promotion processes will be kicked off, the old name and the new name

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            Hide
            mpeters Michael Peters added a comment -

            I'm seeing this happen again on v2.22 of this plugin.

            We renamed a promotion process and it resulted in double stars. We changed the name back and added a 2nd identical promotion process with the new name and deleted the old one. Still results in double stars.

            Show
            mpeters Michael Peters added a comment - I'm seeing this happen again on v2.22 of this plugin. We renamed a promotion process and it resulted in double stars. We changed the name back and added a 2nd identical promotion process with the new name and deleted the old one. Still results in double stars.
            Hide
            mpeters Michael Peters added a comment -

            I should note, that this is happening to a job inside of a new folder. I don't know if that would make a difference or not.

            Show
            mpeters Michael Peters added a comment - I should note, that this is happening to a job inside of a new folder. I don't know if that would make a difference or not.
            Hide
            gradalajage Kyle Estes added a comment -

            I saw this in v2.19. I thought updating to latest might fix it, but it continues to happen in v2.23.1. Like Michael Peters this is happening for a job in a folder.

            Show
            gradalajage Kyle Estes added a comment - I saw this in v2.19. I thought updating to latest might fix it, but it continues to happen in v2.23.1. Like Michael Peters this is happening for a job in a folder.
            Hide
            aheritier Arnaud Héritier added a comment -

            This is not related to the usage of folders (the same problem exists without it).

            Workaround:

            • Open you job configuration
            • Add new promotion with the previous name before the renaming. They can be empty. Myself I just checked "Promote immediately once the build is complete"
            • Save your configuration
            • Open you job configuration a second time
            • Remove the promotion with the old name
            • Save your configuration

            Your job should now work correctly without breaking old promotions and the object model.

            The issue will be fixed by JENKINS-27716 in promotion plugin > 2.23.1 if you are running on Jenkins >= 1.585

            Show
            aheritier Arnaud Héritier added a comment - This is not related to the usage of folders (the same problem exists without it). Workaround: Open you job configuration Add new promotion with the previous name before the renaming. They can be empty. Myself I just checked "Promote immediately once the build is complete" Save your configuration Open you job configuration a second time Remove the promotion with the old name Save your configuration Your job should now work correctly without breaking old promotions and the object model. The issue will be fixed by JENKINS-27716 in promotion plugin > 2.23.1 if you are running on Jenkins >= 1.585
            Hide
            mpeters Michael Peters added a comment -

            I actually tried this work around multiple times with v2.22 and it did not fix it. Hopefully 2.23.1 fixes this.

            Show
            mpeters Michael Peters added a comment - I actually tried this work around multiple times with v2.22 and it did not fix it. Hopefully 2.23.1 fixes this.

              People

              • Assignee:
                petehayes Peter Hayes
                Reporter:
                petehayes Peter Hayes
              • Votes:
                8 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                7 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                • Created:
                  Updated:
                  Resolved: