Uploaded image for project: 'Jenkins Website'
  1. Jenkins Website
  2. WEBSITE-474

"Installing Jenkins in Docker" section refers to Blue Ocean image instead of the official jenkins/jenkins one

    Details

    • Similar Issues:

      Description

      It is a follow-up to the discussion in IRC. Apparently Jenkins Docker installation guidelines recommend the BlueOcean container instead of the official Jenkins one. See https://jenkins.io/doc/book/installing/#downloading-and-running-jenkins-in-docker

      See the screenshot

      CC Michael Neale

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            Hide
            oleg_nenashev Oleg Nenashev added a comment -

            I would be in favor of a good BlueOcean image as a helpful bundle, but there is a serious UX issue in the current image: JENKINS-52069. jenkinci/blueocean is that plugins.txt is NOT compatible with the installation wizard. So it causes a really messy UX for thos who does not use Configuration-as-code. And there is no much sense to use the image with Configuration-as-code, because it can be easily defined in plugins.txt: https://github.com/oleg-nenashev/jenkins-blueocean-experimental/blob/java11/plugins.txt

            So I am in favor of deprecating the image if there is no plan to invest into improving it. And there is a dev list thread which suggests that there is no immediate plans for that: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/jenkinsci-dev/zNukeuLK4Og/KP3mfQ2ZFAAJ

             

             

            Show
            oleg_nenashev Oleg Nenashev added a comment - I would be in favor of a good BlueOcean image as a helpful bundle, but there is a serious UX issue in the current image: JENKINS-52069 . jenkinci/blueocean is that plugins.txt is NOT compatible with the installation wizard. So it causes a really messy UX for thos who does not use Configuration-as-code. And there is no much sense to use the image with Configuration-as-code, because it can be easily defined in plugins.txt: https://github.com/oleg-nenashev/jenkins-blueocean-experimental/blob/java11/plugins.txt So I am in favor of deprecating the image if there is no plan to invest into improving it. And there is a dev list thread which suggests that there is no immediate plans for that:  https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/jenkinsci-dev/zNukeuLK4Og/KP3mfQ2ZFAAJ    
            Hide
            alecharp Adrien Lecharpentier added a comment -
            Show
            alecharp Adrien Lecharpentier added a comment - I filled https://github.com/jenkins-infra/jenkins.io/pull/2148  to track this.
            Hide
            zbynek Zbynek Konecny added a comment -

            Adrien Lecharpentier given the comments in the PR I assume this needs changes before it can be reviewed again (hence the status change in review->in progress).

            Show
            zbynek Zbynek Konecny added a comment - Adrien Lecharpentier given the comments in the PR I assume this needs changes before it can be reviewed again (hence the status change in review->in progress).
            Hide
            oleg_nenashev Oleg Nenashev added a comment -

            Would be great to get it over the line

            Show
            oleg_nenashev Oleg Nenashev added a comment - Would be great to get it over the line
            Hide
            oleg_nenashev Oleg Nenashev added a comment -
            Show
            oleg_nenashev Oleg Nenashev added a comment - New issue in GitHub:  https://github.com/jenkins-infra/jenkins.io/issues/3315

              People

              • Assignee:
                vsilverman Vlad Silverman
                Reporter:
                oleg_nenashev Oleg Nenashev
              • Votes:
                1 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                6 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                • Created:
                  Updated: