Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Resolved (View Workflow)
    • Priority: Minor
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Component/s: core
    • Environment:
    • Similar Issues:
    • Released As:
      Jenkins 2.178

      Description

      I've seen these error messages in my console output, which comes from jmdns.

      The level of the logging messages should be toned down significantly given that these are from a relatively minor feature in Jenkins.

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            Hide
            fcojfernandez Francisco Fernández added a comment -

            I've been doing some research here and updating the library seems to fix the problem. At least is a starting point. 

            As I can see, the library was forked just because we want to use an abort method instead of the close method provided by jmdns. Moving the logic of this abort method to the core, probably we can put aside the fork and use the library instead, so any update would be easier. Opening a PR soon.

            Show
            fcojfernandez Francisco Fernández added a comment - I've been doing some research here and updating the library seems to fix the problem. At least is a starting point.  As I can see, the library was forked just because we want to use an abort  method instead of the close method provided by jmdns. Moving the logic of this abort method to the core, probably we can put aside the fork and use the library instead, so any update would be easier. Opening a PR soon.
            Hide
            oleg_nenashev Oleg Nenashev added a comment -

            It was released in Jenkins 2.178, but we do not think backporting is justified for now

            Show
            oleg_nenashev Oleg Nenashev added a comment - It was released in Jenkins 2.178, but we do not think backporting is justified for now
            Hide
            oleg_nenashev Oleg Nenashev added a comment -

            LTS backporting comment: let's do more testing before considering backporting

            Show
            oleg_nenashev Oleg Nenashev added a comment - LTS backporting comment: let's do more testing before considering backporting
            Hide
            olivergondza Oliver Gondža added a comment - - edited
            Show
            olivergondza Oliver Gondža added a comment - - edited Oleg Nenashev , Francisco Fernández , have you gain enough confidence in backporting https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/4021 and https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/4037  into .2?
            Hide
            olivergondza Oliver Gondža added a comment -

            I am rejecting the backport to be added to 2.176 LTS line. Will appear in the next one naturally.

            Show
            olivergondza Oliver Gondža added a comment - I am rejecting the backport to be added to 2.176 LTS line. Will appear in the next one naturally.

              People

              • Assignee:
                fcojfernandez Francisco Fernández
                Reporter:
                uday Udaypal Aarkoti
              • Votes:
                12 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                25 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                • Created:
                  Updated:
                  Resolved: