Uploaded image for project: 'Jenkins'
  1. Jenkins
  2. JENKINS-57528

Jenkins in Docker does not install detached plugins when there is no UC data

    XMLWordPrintable

    Details

    • Similar Issues:
    • Released As:
      Jenkins 2.178

      Description

      It is a placeholder for https://github.com/jenkinsci/docker/issues/698 and for https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/4000 which addresses it in the core

      Using newer cores that have part of it moved to plugins and is now implied dependencies in other plugins is causing to have bad Jenkins installation.

       

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            Hide
            nrayapati Naresh Rayapati added a comment - - edited

            Jesse Glick Thanks for the light. We didn't know about this thing, so far we are using .hpi files those are downloaded directly from the repo. All of our jenkins instances are currently running on this setup.

            is that just rename or do we need to do anything special after downloading those .hpi files from the repo? 

             

            Show
            nrayapati Naresh Rayapati added a comment - - edited Jesse Glick Thanks for the light. We didn't know about this thing, so far we are using .hpi files those are downloaded directly from the repo. All of our jenkins instances are currently running on this setup. is that just rename or do we need to do anything special after downloading those .hpi files from the repo?   
            Hide
            jglick Jesse Glick added a comment -

            The files in the plugins directory are expected to be named ARTIFACT_ID.jpi, so for example script-security.jpi rather than script-security-1.58.hpi (filename in Artifactory) or script-security.hpi (filename in updates.jenkins.io).

            Show
            jglick Jesse Glick added a comment - The files in the plugins directory are expected to be named ARTIFACT_ID.jpi , so for example script-security.jpi rather than script-security-1.58.hpi (filename in Artifactory) or script-security.hpi (filename in updates.jenkins.io).
            Hide
            jglick Jesse Glick added a comment -

            I filed a refinement in jenkins #4039 to improve the behavior and make it more apparent what you were doing wrong.

            Show
            jglick Jesse Glick added a comment - I filed a refinement in jenkins #4039 to improve the behavior and make it more apparent what you were doing wrong.
            Hide
            nrayapati Naresh Rayapati added a comment -

            Thank you very much Jesse Glick we changed our script to use .jpi instead of .hpi and also removed the version from the file name. It worked!

            Thanks again really appreciate your inputs.

            Show
            nrayapati Naresh Rayapati added a comment - Thank you very much Jesse Glick we changed our script to use .jpi instead of .hpi and also removed the version from the file name. It worked! Thanks again really appreciate your inputs.
            Hide
            jglick Jesse Glick added a comment -

            There was an ATH regression which it is hoped form-element-path #8 will help correct.

            Show
            jglick Jesse Glick added a comment - There was an ATH regression which it is hoped form-element-path #8 will help correct.

              People

              • Assignee:
                jglick Jesse Glick
                Reporter:
                oleg_nenashev Oleg Nenashev
              • Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                5 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                • Created:
                  Updated:
                  Resolved: